Search This Blog

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Possible "head and shoulders" pattern could signal further stock declines

The S&P 500 appears to be forming a classic head and shoulders pattern, which simply means that if you look at the chart, the shape that the chart is forming resembles a left shoulder, higher head, and then a right shoulder:



If the chart tops before reaching the recent highs and turns negative again, we will have a right shoulder.  Typically, and head and shoulders pattern signals further declines for stocks, which is exactly what I expect to see.  However, should stocks continue to advance, pushing past the recent highs, the head and shoulders pattern will not form, and we could see even higher levels for stocks.  This is certainly a possibility, but I believe the probability is with lower stock prices in the near-term.  We shall see!

Wednesday, April 11, 2012

Today's bounce a critical test

Stocks are rebounding so far this morning, after yesterday's 214 point drop on the Dow - the worst day for 2012 to-date.  Ten minutes into the trading session, we are up a little over 100 points on the Dow.  Today's bounce will be a critical test of the correction that began only a few trading session ago - if stocks can print a positive result today, the downtrend could potentially be broken, giving investors confidence to come back into the market.  However, if this bounce fails, and stocks end the session lower, the downtrend will be confirmed and investors will likely look for the exits in increasing numbers.

Monday, April 9, 2012

Median home prices in Santa Barbara County down 61% from the peak

Yes, you read the title correctly, the median home price in Santa Barbara County has fallen from a high in July of 2007 of $878,124 to the current (February 2012) $345,000, or by 61%.  Those who refuse to believe the obvious will argue that the median price for the county includes the north county, which has experienced a much more severe drop in prices that the south county, which includes the city of Santa Barbara.  True enough, but the peak median home price in July of 2007 also included the north county!  Detractors may also argue that because we are a smaller area, the number of home sales can skew the results.  True again.  However, we have to look at the long-term trend, and looking at the decline in median home prices, it is more than clear that prices have been absolutely pummeled from the 2007 peak until now.  Further, it is clear that we are not experiencing a bottoming process.  We are still declining, despite some fairly significant fluctuations on a month-to-month basis.

I do not think we have seen the bottom yet, specifically because the economy has not really recovered significantly, and most importantly, because interest rates are still historically very low.  When (not if) rates go back up, prices will be forced down further to reflect affordability and the continuing unwillingness of banks to lend.  Rates in the 7%+ range will force prices down at least another 20% from current levels.  We won't see rates climb back to that level for at least another 18 to 24 months, so we will not see a bottom in real estate prices until sometime after rates move up and then flatten out.  Real estate cycles take many years to play out, and we are still in the early stages of the boom to bust cycle.  I expect the bottom to happen in 2014, to take a year or two to form, and then a slow recovery for prices should commence, probably starting in 2016 or 2017.  

Those Looking for a Fed Bailout via QE3 Are Facing Disappointment - Published in Noozhawk on Monday, April 9, 2012

Saturday, April 7, 2012

Those looking for a Fed bailout via QE3 will be disappointed

Much has been discussed regarding a third round of quantitative easing, or QE3, where the Fed would borrow and then use the proceeds to buy long-term bonds, driving rates down, bond prices higher, and in the process flood the economy with even more cash.  Many (incorrectly) assume that the previous two rounds of quantitative easing have been undertaken as a direct response (by the Fed) to weak stock market performance.  In fact, both previous rounds - QE 1and QE 2 - have taken place immediately following significant drops in stock market levels.  However and very importantly, Fed action with regard to QE has not been the direct result of stock market declines, but rather the economic turmoil that caused stock market declines.  This is a very important distinction, because, if we are trying to predict when and if the Fed with conduct a third round of QE, it would be incorrect and even dangerous to assume that if the stock market corrects to a certain level or percentage decline, that the Fed will step-in to address that correction with more QE.

The old adage - correlation does not equal causation is a critical and accurate description of the Fed's previous QE operations.  In other words, the Fed did not conduct QE because stocks corrected, but because of the economic factors that caused stocks to correct; namely the financial market collapse and disruptions of late 2008/early 2009, and double-digit unemployment and negative GDP growth coupled with real estate market foreclosures and other severe economic problems that we saw at the end of 2010.  Falling stock prices did not motivate the Fed to conduct QE!

Now that the economy is showing signs of sustainable improvement, I do not believe that, should we see a correction in equities begin, that the Fed will automatically step-in with more QE.  In fact, the minutes from the most recent Fed meeting specifically indicate that the Fed is not planning to conduct Q3, at least anytime soon, and only if the economy contracts significantly.  Any belief to the contrary is nothing more than wishful thinking of overly optimistic market pundits searching for any justification to keep stocks moving higher regardless of the current obviously over bought market.

Investors would be wise to avoid falling into this mindset and accept the fact that stocks have rallied to unsustainable levels, at least in the short-term, and are therefore due for a pull-back.  Expectations of a Fed bailout to sustain the current, long-standing stock market rally naively assume that the Fed somehow cares about whether stock investors make short-term paper profits.  I assure you that they do not.  The Fed is concerned with long-term, structural and fundamental trends in unemployment and GDP growth.  The day-to-day, week-to-week, and month-to-month gyrations in stocks are of very little concern to the Fed, and they are certainly not going to borrow additional billions of dollars more just to prevent stock investors from giving back paper gains they have attained over the past 6 months.

Keep in mind that if market pundits are at a point where they need to grasp at straws, meaning depending on the Fed for QE3, to bail them out as their only chance of sustaining the current stock market rally, instead of valuations, earnings, economic growth, etc., anyone long stocks should be very concerned!  I personally like stocks for the long-term, and feel that they are the most attractive investment vehicle, in comparison to real estate, bonds, commodities, etc.  However, I feel very strongly that stocks are overdue for a significant correction, which is why I am holding very large cash positions at present.  This coming week marks the beginning of earnings season, which looks to disappoint.

We have had consistent earnings outperformance since the fourth quarter of 2008, which has contributed to the strength and longevity of the current stock market rally.  For the first quarter since the end of 2008, we will have a weaker, disappointing quarter where companies overall show slowing growth and many disappoint in terms of earnings projections.  This, coupled with the weak jobs report for March - only 120,000 jobs added; far less than the 200,000+ expected, should result in continued selling pressure on stocks.  A correction, therefore is not only likely, it is a healthy component of any bull-market rally, and should come as no surprise to any seasoned investor.  No market goes straight up or straight down, and the more investors try to fight the natural course of market dynamics, the more losses they will suffer.  Savvy investors will understand that corrections are a natural and necessary part of any long-term advance for stocks, and will embrace this process.

Friday, April 6, 2012

Futures down hard after jobs data

U.S. stock futures are down dramatically after the Commerce Department reported that only 120,000 jobs were added in March, well below the expected 200,000+, and the smallest increase in 5 months.  Today is a trading holiday for Good Friday, so traders and investors will have to wait until Monday to react to this news.  We also have earnings season for the first quarter kicking off on April 10th with Alcoa's report.  Earnings look to be weaker than previous quarters, and I expect a negative reaction from stocks, unless we see consistent surprises to the upside throughout earnings season.  I remain cautious and have substantial cash positions waiting for a pull-back.  I like stocks in general and want to re-enter the market, but only at lower levels.  I will look to phase back into stocks as the market corrects, working through the technical support levels to select the most appropriate time to buy.